Call Now For Help


NJ Criminal Conviction Reversed


by in Criminal Appeals

State v. Frank G. Dellisanti, ? N.J. ?, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 387 (April 27, 2010) – Convictions reversed. “Defendant Frank Dellisanti was on trial in Bergen County Superior Court when sheriff’s officers from another county arrived to arrest him for an unrelated probation violation…. [T]he record is barren of any indication that defendant voluntarily waived his right to be present during the concluding stages of his criminal trial [i.e., during answers to jury questions and the announcement of the verdict]….

We hold, in the exceptional circumstances presented here, that the wishes, preferences, or convenience of sheriff’s officers acting to arrest defendant during jury deliberations cannot be permitted to trump defendant’s right under Rule 3:16(b) to insist on being present through to the trial’s conclusion and the rendering of the verdict. Because the record does not establish that the Rule’s conditions for waiver were satisfied, we must conclude that defendant’s right to presence under Rule 3:16(b) was violated, unfairly, through no action of his own.

We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial because the proceedings that were allowed to occur here were defective and unjust…. [N]o decision of our Court has confronted a fact pattern akin to the present case, where a seemingly unwilling defendant was hauled from the courtroom by another vicinage’s law enforcement officers while awaiting the jury’s return from deliberating on his verdict, and thereby was deprived of the right, clearly granted him under Rule 3:16(b), to be present and face his jury when it returned its verdict….

Moreover, to promote compliance with the Rule’s salutary purposes and promises to criminal defendants in particular and to the public at large, we further hold that the trial court must ensure that a warrant from another jurisdiction does not prevent a defendant from being present during his trial. If a defendant wishes to waive his or her presence mid-trial due to the intercession of law enforcement officers of any jurisdiction, the defendant’s waiver must be on the record. The trial court must not cede control over his or her courtroom.”






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.