Call Now For Help


NJ Criminal Judge


by in Criminal Appeals

This NJ Criminal appeal was recently won after the trial judge failed to explain to the jury the reasons for defendant’s absence during part of the trial.

State v. James Rippy, unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-6069-07T4 (December 14, 2010) – Convictions reversed.

“[D]efendant contends that the trial judge committed plain error by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury on his absence from the trial and by giving an erroneous instruction on coconspirator liability for the robbery…. The trial judge gave the Election Not To Testify charge. This was insufficient; as the charge’s language does not address defendant’s absence, thus impermissibly leaving the jury free to speculate about why he was not present at trial, and to infer guilt from his absence. Because of the potential for prejudice due to defendant’s absence from trial, the failure to sua sponte give the ‘Absence From Trial’ charge was clearly capable of producing an unjust result warranting reversal of defendant’s conviction.

“As for the conspirator liability charge, …, to determine whether defendant was vicariously liable for the robbery that Rivera committed, the critical issue became whether defendant’s conscious object in conspiring with Rivera was to promote the crime of robbery or make it easier for Rivera to commit the robbery. The charge given was not limited to the State’s alternative theory of coconspirator liability for the robbery. Rather, it instructed the jury on coconspirator liability as an alternative theory of guilt as to all of the crimes with which defendant was charged. This error impermissibly left the jury free to find defendant liable for the robbery Rivera committed as long as it believed that defendant’s conscious object was to promote either burglary, assault or weapons possession. Thus, the instruction was clearly capable of producing an unjust result warranting reversal of defendant’s robbery conviction.”






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.