Call Now For Help


NJ Inmate Wins On Criminal Appeal


by in Criminal Defense

This NJ inmate won on appeal after having been convicted of drug possession. Figueroa v. New Jersey DOC, ? N.J. Super. ?, 2010 N.J. super. LEXIS ? (June 28, 2010) – DOC determination reversed.

“Because the DOC failed to prove appellant knew the item he was attempting to possess contained a prohibited substance under the regulation, we reverse…. Appellant was found guilty of attempting to possess marijuana. Although the term ‘possession’ is not contained in the definitional sections of the administrative code governing inmate discipline, N.J.A.C. 10A:1-2.2 and N.J.A.C. 10A:4-1.3, we are satisfied that in the context of prohibited act *.203, we should construe the term as the Court defined it for the purpose of imposing criminal liability under statutes charging individuals with possession of controlled dangerous substances, that is, ‘[p]ossession . . . signifies a knowing, intentional control of a designated thing, accompanied by a knowledge of its character.’ State v. Pena, 178 N.J. 297, 305 (2004) (quotations omitted)…. The hearing officer’s findings do not reasonably support the conclusion that appellant was aware that the tobacco pack Veguilla handed Washington on appellant’s behalf contained marijuana.”






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.