Call Now For Help


NJ Robbery Conviction Reversed For Suggestive Police ID “Show-up”


by in Criminal Appeals

State v. Luis A. Rivera, unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-4098-07T4 (July 19, 2010) – Conviction for New Jersey Robbery reversed on appeal.

“After defendant was apprehended, Patrolman Wortley transported the Witkowskis from their friend’s house to the motel to attempt to make an identification of the suspect. Sgt. Robert Lasko of the Sayreville Police Department testified that Mrs. Witkowski was too upset to even attempt to identify the suspect. Mr. Witkowski, however, identified the suspect as the robber from approximately twenty feet away. Mr. Witkowski died on April 9, 2007. At trial, Sgt. Lasko testified that Mr. Witkowski was able to partially identify defendant at the motel on the day defendant was apprehended…. The State agrees that evidence of Mr. Witkowski’s identification at the motel should not have been admitted at trial. It argues, however, that the error was harmless because it submitted other evidence identifying defendant as the robber through Mrs. Witkowski and relied on her identification of defendant at trial to overcome the inadmissible evidence…. Based on the evidence adduced at trial, we conclude that the admission of Mr. Witkowski’s identification of defendant at a show-up within an hour of the robbery cannot be considered harmless error. A show-up is an inherently suggestive identification procedure. State v. Herrera, 187 N.J. 493, 504 (2006). Defendant was arrested based on Mr. Witkowski’s identification. The only admissible identification testimony appears informed by a prior identification by a loved one during an inherently suggestive procedure. In short, we hold that the admission of Mr. Witkowski’s prior identification is error of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result.”






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.