Call Now For Help


Trial Judge Should Have Given Jury Identification Charge


by in Criminal Defense

State v. Omar Bridges, unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-0806-07T4 (September 8, 2010) – Convictions reversed.

“Defendant … argues that the trial judge should have provided an identification charge to guide the jury’s evaluation of the testimony of Officer Patinho and co-defendant Ollie. The State responds that the extensive credibility instruction provided by the trial judge adequately addressed his concerns. Given Officer Patinho’s limited opportunity to view the shooter, an identification charge was critical to allow the jury to properly evaluate the in-court identification by the victim of his assailant…. It is abundantly clear that identification was a central and critical issue in the case. The State had to prove that defendant was the person firing a weapon at Officer Patinho and Officer Gsavatich and the person who shot Officer Patinho. In doing so, it relied principally on the testimony of Patinho, who testified that he saw the passenger riding behind the driver briefly ‘peek’ out of the rear passenger side window. Based on that glimpse, Patinho identified defendant at trial as the shooter. Yet, the jury received no instructions on the elements it should consider in its evaluation of this identification. They were not instructed to consider the time-of-day, lighting, the amount of time the victim had to view his assailant, whether the assailant was previously known to the victim, and a host of other salient factors for the jury’s consideration…. In summary, we hold that the omission of an identification charge on Officer Patinho’s identification of defendant was a critical error in this case.”






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.