Call Now For Help


When a Different NJ Officer Administers the Breath Test (part II)


by in DWI Defense

Naturally, less than a week after writing my last entry on this topic, the New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division weighed in on whether a different officer who administers the breath test may conduct the 20-minute observation period. In a decision that offers a mixed back for NJ DWI-DUI defendants and their attorneys, the court in State v. Ugrovics held that yes, a different officer may do so.

The court held that “Consistent with the underlying principles articulated by the Court in Chun, we hold that the State is only required to establish that the test subject did not ingest, regurgitate or place anything in his or her mouth that may compromise the reliability of the test results for a period of at least twenty minutes prior to the administration of the Alcotest. The essence of this requirement is to ensure that the test subject has been continuously observed during this critical twenty-minute window of time. The identity of the observer is not germane to this central point. The State can meet this burden by calling any competent witness who can so attest.”

This is a departure from the Law Division’s unpublished decision in State v. Nucifora, which held that the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Chun clearly held that it must be the same officer. Further, the court in Ugrovics appears to ignore the clear language of the Supreme Court in Chun.

Nevertheless, Ugrovics is clear that there must be testimony from an officer who can attest that the defendant was continuously observed for the 20 minutes prior to the administration of the breath test to ensure that the subject did not regurgitate alcohol into his or her mouth.






*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey | Rating Methodology | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
The information contained in on this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio and while we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to The Law Offices of Anthony J. Vecchio or the information, products, or services contained on for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
The results of verdicts and settlements mentioned herein are not typical. Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

Site by Law Firm Website Designers / Criminal Defense/DWI Lawyer Marketing.